Showing posts with label robots. Show all posts
Showing posts with label robots. Show all posts

Friday, 25 September 2020

Three laughs: Rocky IV


It is hard to rate some trashy films. Films can be really good entertainment in spite of the quality of the filmmaking. In fact, it might be even harder to create unique trash that keeps surprising you than most "quality" films with which you know what you are going to get. It certainly is an even better pleasure to watch them. My friend says that he knows a trash film is worth something if it gets three laughs out of me. I mean proper, good belly laughs when you just can't believe what the film is showing to you, scene after scene. That's as good a rating as any for these movies. Any film that has these three laughs has a special place in my heart.

★ or ★★★★★


 

Three laughs case file #38:
Rocky IV (USA, 1985)
Director: Sylvester Stallone

So, as many movie directors these days have too much time on their hands, many have started to recut some of their films they feel didn't really work in their first form. Francis Ford Coppola is working on Godfather III, Steven Soderbergh has probably already gone through half of his filmography, and Sylvester Stallone has Rocky IV.

But why Rocky IV? It's as close to perfection as anything Stallone has ever made, and Creed notwithstanding, my favorite of the never-ending Rocky series. It turns out Stallone has changed his mind about Paulie's robot and he explains he doesn't like it any more. So, it would seem Stallone would cut out some of the movie's bizarreness and make it just a so-so melodrama, which the Rocky saga already has in abundance.

Well, here at Last Movieblog we are undoubtedly pro-robot. Stallone may recut all he wants but we will always have the original version (Right? He's no George Lucas, right?), so let's have a look at some of the laughs offered by the Rocky Ivee.


 

Three laughs (SPOILERS):

1. Before the movie has even settled to be a metaphor for the fight against the US and the Soviet Union, we see Ol' Rock has become a wealthy man since his underdog days. He lives in a huge mansion with his family. In fact, he even buys his friend Paulie (Burt Young) an expensive birthday gift. But he doesn't get the sports car he wanted, he gets a weird, bug-eyed robot that's probably meant more for Rocky's young son. In fact, the reason the robot is in the movie is that it's a helper tool that Stallone's actual son used for his autism.

Nevertheless, there's a big laugh coming on when inexplicably Paulie has switched the robots controls later on, so it uses a chirpy female voice and serves him beer. Knowing the background makes it even doubly bizarre that Stallone implies Paulie would use his robot for sex.  

2. I always enjoy Dolph Lundgren and feel like, as an actor, he got served the short stick and could have given so much more in his heyday. The scene when he's raised to his fight with Apollo Creed is carried by his face of confusion when he sees a Las Vegas -style gaudy James Brown musical number with small airplanes in the roof, showgirls, acrobats, and some sort of giant golden calf statue. Is Stallone implying that Americans are worshipping a false god? The sneeding way Lundgren delivers his line "You will lose" to Creed who he's about to kill in the ring, is also nothing short of magnificent.

3. A usual critique of the movie is that it's half montages set to the cheesiest arena rock the 80's had to offer. My personal favorite is the one set to Robert Tappert's No Easy Way Out where Rocky is driving around with tears on his faces thinking about his friend Apollo and the homoerotic scenes in Rocky III when they were running on the beach and bear-huuging in the waves. There's some shots of Adrian and classic Rocky training montages thrown in for good measure, of course, since the film is no homo.

Friday, 18 September 2020

Three laughs: Robotrix


It is hard to rate some trashy films. Films can be really good entertainment in spite of the quality of the filmmaking. In fact, it might be even harder to create unique trash that keeps surprising you than most "quality" films with which you know what you are going to get. It certainly is an even better pleasure to watch them. My friend says that he knows a trash film is worth something if it gets three laughs out of me. I mean proper, good belly laughs when you just can't believe what the film is showing to you, scene after scene. That's as good a rating as any for these movies. Any film that has these three laughs has a special place in my heart.  

★ or ★★★★★

Three laughs case file #37:  
Robotrix (Nu ji xie ren, Hongkong, 1991)
Director: Jamie Luk

I've heard movie pitches a lot worse than "sexy RoboCop". During Hongkong's mad "CAT III" years, someone had the bright idea, not only to do a combined scifi actioner and softcore film, but to also have it basically be Terminator 2 as well, having two killer robots battle it out. The evil robot, played by Billy Chow, is REALLY EVIL, and during the course of the movie performs rather nasty sexual violence against sex workers. So, there's a Trigger Warning to go with the film, they really don't slow down as it gets started.

The film has a little tongue in cheek, as in the beginning we see a German robot that resembles a little of the ol' T-800, and an American robot that in turn has stereotypical mullet wig and if I needed to make a guess, seems to be a reference to Jean-Claude Van Damme's Cyborg. Mammary-heavy Amy Yip plays the android body into which a dead policewoman's brain is inserted into. There's little nudity, though, even though for the first time in Hongkong cinema, Chow also reveals his member in a quick scene.

A lot of the film plays up the comedy rather than the serial-killing robot hunting. Not all of it is intentional, bad dubbing, bizarre dialogue and hammy acting carries a lot of the fun. Yip's cyborg is put on an undercover mission disguised as a sex worker, and caused by this, starts a really successful police-run brothel business, that also her co-workers in blue seem to enjoy using. Chikako Ayoma plays Yip's rival policewoman that comes to rely on her as a partner before the film's bloody climax.


Three laughs (SPOILERS):

1. The film's flimsy plot consists of several elements that don't quite click together. We are introduced to the villain of the film when he uses sleeping gas to knock out everyone in a bath house and to kidnap the daughter of an Arab prince to... ransom her for money? This idea doesn't really play out in the following scenes. But at this point Yip is still playing a flesh-and-blood policewoman. It is proven she is no match for the precision of a cyborg as she is immediately shot in the chest by the villain. She'll get better.

 2. The bad android's sex drive is so huge, he goes to bars picking on small-time gangsters' girlfriends. This enrages the Triad guys and they take the fight... to the toilet? As the android refuses to pay to use her, he is attacked, but the robot just punches the gangster so hard to the stomach, it implodes. The Itchy & Scratchy -level cartoonish violence that reminds of films like Riki-Oh is one of the best reasons to watch these CAT III films. There's also a memorable scene with a drill in this one.

3. Of the police group's characters, the most annoying one is the bearded sex-hungry virgin guy, who also tried to get a free round with sex worker Robotrix by disguising himself. In the lead up to the climax, he is unceremoniously cut in half with a car. The characters in the film are very sad to see him die, the audiences back home may have an entirely different reaction to seeing the sleazebag go.

Friday, 7 October 2011

The Arnold Project, pt. III: The Indestructible Machine



Good old Arnold is already filming his comeback films. Yet it remains unknown whether the audiences will take the 64-year-old former Governor back with open arms. The State of California is on the verge of bankruptcy after him, and his affairs and subsequent divorce probably won't earn him any favors with Joe Movieticket either. What Arnold should do, is return to play villains. Every actor knows that it's a lot more fun, and everyone loves a good unexpected villain. Well, better than anyone unliked trying to portray himself heroic anyway. Here's hoping Arnold will be on antagonist duties in The Expendables 2. But as far as his former villain roles go, there was one awful, and one so exceptionally good, that it wrote his entire career for him.

Image from Groucho Reviews.

This post is about the latter. Now, let's take a look at Arnold's three Terminator movies from three different decades.


The Terminator (1984)
Director: James Cameron


The struggling writer-director James Cameron (of Piranha II: The Spawning fame) had a nightmare one night presumably from reading too many Harlan Ellison short stories. He would do a completely original film about a killer robot from the future that could easily disguise himself among other humans. The unrelenting machine would be sent here only to kill and it wouldn't rest until it had reached and liquidated its target. And it would be played by an everyman actor, such as Lance Henriksen or O.J. Simpson.

The main idea was, of course scrapped when on-the-rise star of Conan the Barbarian saw his chance in the role. Instead, the Terminator became physically intimidating, as a machine of perfect build and the elbow-grease to really pursue its target to the end of the world. Probably everyone reading this already knows the main idea. In the future, World is under the rule of the Machines... well, not entirely. There is a small group of guerrilla fighters that continues to resist against the legions of killer machines. With the help of a time machine, the machines send a robot to kill the leader of the Resistance before he is even born. But alongside the Terminator, also the guerrilla fighters manage to send one of them, Kyle Reese (Michael Biehn), back in time to the 80's. They both race to find Sarah Connor (Linda Hamilton), a timid waitress, who is set to give birth to the future leader of the resistance. Reese's entire life has been a fight for survival, but in his protection, also Sarah's life goes through a turmoil.

Arnold actually has quite little screen-time, but his little-speaking machine certainly steals every scene he's in. It's no wonder even throwaway lines such as "I'll Be Back" became so popular. Arnold's deadpan delivery make them seem even more meaningful than they are. Because of the relatively small budget, this is really more of a thriller than an action film. But still there is plenty of violence, as the Terminator kills his way through an entire police station. Cameron directs with notable confidence (probably because this time around he didn't have Italian trash movie producers nullifying everything he did), and keeps the film's pace brisk. The audience has barely more time to catch their breath than the main characters.

Cameron creates a self-titled "Tech Noir" athmosphere. The film is dark, lit by red and blue neon lights. There's smoke and water everywhere. At the end, when Terminator is forced to shed off his human skin, the film suffers, as the cheap stop motion effects take over where Arnold left off. Worse, the skeletal robot's charisma isn't anywhere near Arnold's!

★★★★

Cleaning man: Hey, buddy. You got a dead cat in there, or what?
[POSSIBLE RESPONSE: YES/NO; OR WHAT?; GO AWAY; PLEASE COME BACK LATER; FUCK YOU, ASSHOLE; FUCK YOU]
The Terminator: Fuck you, asshole.

Terminator 2: Judgement Day (1991)
Director: James Cameron


Cameron, that modern David Lean, decided to raise the biggest budget the world has ever seen for his follow-up to the film that made him famous. He also waited for seven years to finalize his vision and for the technology to catch up with what he had in mind. Say what you say about him, but at least his films have always been part of developing and trying out new film techniques. But this time the reason they were used was also good – Cameron wanted to make an unforgettable sequel that would dwarf its predecessor with massive action scenes. He also had a good story about fighting for a better future. And he did manage to do one of the best big-budget sequels ever made.

While John Connor (Edward Furlong) has grown into a pre-teen, his mother Sarah is closed into a mental institution for his crazy stories about killer robots and the upcoming judgement day. Another of T-800, model 101's is sent back in time, alongside another robot, the T-1000 (Robert Patrick). But this time the Arnold-model has been rebooted as a protection droid, that's supposed to save John Connor's life. T-1000, however, is sent to crush, kill and destroy, and as it has been made from liquid metals, he can also modify his body and survive injuries better.

But enough about the plot, you've probably seen the film, or at least watched the video above (in case you haven't seen T2, the video has massive SPOILERS). This time Arnold is a little sidelined, while the real star is Linda Hamilton's kick-ass freedom fighter. While being totally capable to fight and plan to fight, she also has motherly instincts, making her one of the most well-rounded female action heroes in Hollywood films. Robert Patrick is also great as he can carry a threatening aura with his near-silent performance. Unlike Arnold, the T-1000 can easily walk around unnoticed and pose as a human. And of course can also alter his looks. The real question is how the hell could he come through the time machine when one of its core functions is that only organic material (such as a Terminator coverded in real skin) can pass through it.

Image from Gizmofusion.

The fact is that The Terminator was concieved during some dark times in the 80's, when it truly looked like the war-mongering of Ronald Reagan might lead the world into a nuclear holocaust. When the air had cleared in the early 90's, the resulting film was also softer in its subtext (don't kill, just maim) and has a hopeful message for peace at the end. Unfortunatelly, while the film's effects have stood the test of time fine, the film is filled with embarrasingly old slang and sayings that make it a lot more cringe-worthy than the hairs and shoulder-toppings in Terminator '84 could ever manage. The film's heart which is T-800 becoming a surrogate father to John, is actually pretty cringe-worthy, thumbs-up and all.

But the real meat, is of course the action and it is phenomenal. From the chase scene through L.A.'s dried water canals to the final showdown at a steel mill, the scenes are big, expensive, innovative, and have been written deeply into every moviegoers collective subconscious. There have been parodies and attempts to better the scenes for years, but very few have managed to top this in any way.

★★★★

T-800: No problemo.

T2-3D: Battle Across Time (1996)
Directors: James Cameron, John Bruno, Stan Winston



Now, to be a completist I'll have to mention this amusement park ride, that got an impressive budget and Arnold, Edward Furlong, Linda Hamilton and Robert Patrick to reprise their roles. James Cameron probably jumped for joy for his first chance to get to work with 3D. He co-directed this short film with his trusted Special Effects supervisors Stan Winston and John Bruno. The "experience" fuses together live action actors, normal film sequences and 3D segments. I haven't seen it whole, but then again I'd have to go to the Universal Theme Park in Hollywood to do so. What I gather from the plot from these YouTube videos, it doesn't properly intertwist with the movies, but then again a proper story would be too much to ask from a simple amusement park video intended to showcase different special effects. Sometimes even the mightiest of big-budget directors need a chance to show off.



T-800: I said I'd be back.

Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (2003)
Director: Jonathan Mostow



For years, Hollywood big shots begged James Cameron to do a third Terminator. The action auteur himself saw the story as complete and had his mind set on some bigger projects already. But judgement day is inevitable. How else would Kyle Reese have been able to father John Connor in the first place? Arnold promised to be back for an obscene amount of money. The movie itself was also obscenely expensive, but still couldn't really do any big action scene better than T2 before it. For die-hard fans of the first two films, the third one is a travesty. For us regular action movie watchers, it is a passable sci fi-action, that would benefit a great deal if it was just a Terminator rip off, not a part of the same story cycle. For one thing, the aged Arnold wouldn't have to fake to still be the same age as he was in 1984.

The film itself checks the same boxes that T2 did. Two robots arrive from the future, the other a T-800 and the other a new kind of Terminator set to kill John Connor (Nick Stahl), now in his 20's. Also the machine is popping off other future resistance leaders. So T-800 must protect Connor at all costs.

Because the international athmosphere had turned threatening again due to 9/11, all the hope for tomorrow that T2 gave has been washed away. Thus, as the name implies, the film takes place at the time the computer system Skynet (thought to have been destroyed in the previous one) becomes self-aware and destroys most of humanity with strategic nuclear weapons.  This newfound gloom and the inevitability of destruction doesn't really fit the story like it used to. There's also a blossoming romance, which feels equally forced and tacked-on. All of these things are just used as things that could be done to make another movie for the cash-spurring franchise. Director Jonathan Mostow doesn't have a lot of imagination or visions what to do with his newfound toys.

Another embarrasing thing is that the endearing 90's slang from the previous film was brought back. So this time, it is even more outdated and cringe-worthy. But really, altough it is a soulless Hollywood money-maker, there's plenty on offer here that would warrant a friday night viewing with friends. Kristianna Loken's T-X seems to be a downgrade from T-1000 with her phallic gun hands, but nevertheless she gives the aged Arnold a couple of good scraps. But the real corkers are the enormous truckfighting chase scene and the shootout at the cemetary. So, while they don't match T2's innovativeness, they are still quite good fun. And while Nick Stahl is a bit too whiny, he's still a billion times more relatable protagonist than the dipshit teenaged Furlong.

★★ 1/2

T-800: No, I am not shitting you. 

Monday, 1 August 2011

Transformers - More just beats the eye

 
I'm back! I've noticed many people have found this site during the summer while googling Michael Bay. And seeing as my Director Michael Bay post was a lame April Fools' Day joke, they no doubt became disappointed. Well, I happened to see the auteur's latest film this summer (I guess I'm a masochist), so I thought this would be a proper time to take a look at the whole Transformers franchise.

What I knew about Transformers in my childhood

I spent the crucial years of my childhood at a time when He-Man and Ghostbusters were just going out of style and the Great Global Turtlemania started. Transformers were a bit older stuff. I saw some toys in Kindergarten but was really not that into them. I never saw a single episode of the cartoon, but seeing as many geeks even today perach by the mythology created by it – and judge Bay's films according to it – I owed myself the chance to get a passing knowledge of what Transformers should be.


Transformers – The Movie (1986)
Director: Nelson Shin


 
Sadly, the film version of the popular animated series doesn't go into depths in explaining what's it all about and who's who in Transformers. But it really isn't rocket science – after all, these are toys fighting each other. The actual Transformer mythology migh have as well been written by a five-year-old. There are these two races of robots, Autobots and Decepticons, and they've been fighting for generations in the planet Cybertron. Both can turn into various items, such as cars, trucks, jets, or, um, guns or boom boxes. You know the Autobots are good because they hang out with humans, go fishing, admire views and pull pranks on each other. The Decepticons spend their time either planning on an attack on Autobots or squabbling over who gets to be their leader. 

One devastating attack leaves both races' leaders – Optimus Prime and Megatron – fatally wounded. Prime passes on his magical Matrix of Leadership to his friend Ultra Magnus (voiced by Robert Stack). The young hotshot Hot Rod (voiced by Judd Apatow) would seem interested in the item as well, as it increases one's powers. Meanwhile, the Decepticons abandon the Not-Yet-Dead Megatron into space, where he stumbles upon a planet named Unicron (voiced by Orson Welles in one of his final roles with amazing gravity for such a thin role). Unicron needs the Matrix of Leadership to destroy Cybertron. I guess, he's a sort of Galactus-like devourer of worlds or something. But anyway, he rebuilds Megatron as Galvatron (voiced by Leonard Nimoy) and sends him off to kill the Autobots. So, the robots do more fighting over that MacGuffin.

"Hey, you! Let's fight!" "Them's fighting words!"

I'm probably almost 20 years too old to fully appreciate this sort of film. But I just got bored when the film is nothing but fighting and teaming up to do more fighting. There are so many characters, that it's impossible to keep track on whether they have any development at all. The exception being Hot Rod, as he learns responsibilty during the course of the film and by the end becomes the Leader of the Autobots. The arc is pure 80's popcorn movie, and so is the incredible heavy metal/new wave soundtrack. The best scene is the incredibly stupid out-of-nowhere robot hoedown, where they all dance to Weird Al Yankovich's "Dare to Be Stupid". They dare.

The film is nicely animated, and doesn't feel like a quick cash-grab like the He-Man movie. There is some funny enough humour, mostly provided by the retarded T-Rex robot Grimlock (voiced by Gregg Berger). "Me, Grimlock, no bozo. Me king!"

★★ 1/2

Transformers (2007)
Director: Michael Bay



After Bad Boys II – the most fun, biggest, craziest and explodion-filledest of Michael Bay's films, it seemd like a good idea for Michael Bay to leave the limiting clutches of Jerry Bruckheimer and do a string of films produced by the golden touch of Steven Spieberg himself. Maybe the subsequent films would have a heart as well as big bangs. But the horrendous The Island proved these hopes wrong. The film tried to be a ponderous sci-fi adventure but was really an exercise in how many car chases can Bay pull out from his ass. The outlook for a live-action version of Transformers was not good, and Bay did deliver a pretty shitty film. Unlike the later ones, the first one has some smart people as fans, and even I must admit it has a few decent action scenes. The problem is, that the viewer doesn't care one bit of anything that goes on with a story. And as 70's George Lucas knows, special effects without a story are boring.

The first offence is that it's always clear that Michael Bay would like to make a film that's only about huge explosions and dick jokes. And military types looking at a radar and getting ready for battle, of course (such scenes are featured dozens of times during the trilogy). But probably because the executive producer Steven Spieberg has insisted, the film has to have a human lead for viewers to identify. Enter Shia LeBouf's Sam Witwicky, a whiny, annoying, insecure little snotnosed punk, who's probably the last person in the world anyone would ever want to identify with. His major problem in life is how to get some tail from the various supermodels he runs into on a weekly basis. His parents are the same sorts of jerks grown up. They are colorfully disappointed with their offspring if he doesn't score with floozies often enough. Sam's favorite floozy is Megan Fox's best Olive Oyl impression as Mikaela. She only initially likes even bigger douchebags than Sam, but changes her mind when she is rescued enough from the clutches of death.

Bay isn't that interested in the films robot characters, either. They get very few establishing scenes and people unfamiliar with the toy franchise will probably only learn to know three robots: Optimus Prime (voiced by Peter Cullen), the heroic wise leader of the good Autobots, Bumblebee, the mute but friendly retard (voiced by various sound bytes), and Megatron, leader of the evil Decepticons (voiced in this first one by Hugo Weaving). These are as deep as the characterizations go in these films, the rest are established by clichés, or racial stereotypes, usually both.

The trouble with the robots here is that it's literally nauseating to just watch them. The iconic blocky but symphatic forms have been switched to CGI monstrosities in which even the tiniest parts move in opposite directions all the time. It's really hard to tell which part represents which piece of anatomy. Bay himself doesn't know, as in his film robots are capable for such feats as peeing on a US agent, played by John Turturro. Bay clerly has some sort of beef with the Coen brothers as he keeps humiliating their most trusted actors in his films.

I miss the blocky toys that looked like toys. These look like a choking hazard.

So, the story is that Sam Witwicky buys a car to score with ladies. He's disappointed to only get a shiny Chevrolet Camaro instead of I guess a Ferrari. But then it's revealed that the car is actually the Autobot Bumblebee in disguise. It turns out Witwicky's grandfather had hid the powerful magical item Allspark somewhere on earth and, um, left some glasses that allow one to interpret robot signs and stuff. The Decepticons arrive to Earth and attemot to kill Sam, but unfortunatelly Bumblebee protects them. When the other Autobots arrive, the story keeps on being as uninteresting, and retarded, but THE EXPLOSIONS GET BIGGER AND LOUDER, SO YOU WON'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE.

I've tended to give this only one star, but seeing as how much worse things went from here, I suppose it earns one extra star for the cool highway chase at least.

★

Transformers: The Revenge of the Fallen (2009)
Director: Michael Bay


The first sequel to Transformers is the worst major big-budget blockbuster ever made. It's loads worse than Batman & Robin, for instance. It's actually so bad, it's on par with Uwe Böll's films in wretchedness. In both, the action scenes are so badly edited and poorly shot, that it's impossible to tell what's happening. And in both, the scenes in between the action are excruciatingly horrible to sit through. The difference is that Bay, in addition to the biggest budget in history, also has plenty of dick jokes in the mix, and a running time of 2,5 fucking hours.

Bay attempts to build the mythology around toy robots with mighty enthusiasm, but is left only confusing the audience and getting himself caught in a corner every five minutes. The bad solutions provided by the script reek of contempt towards the audience, as facts presented only five minutes ago are are constantly forgotten and characters flow in and out of scenes with little to no explanation. Add this to the fact that most robots look exactly alike, and all action scenes are shot VERY CLOSE and one can't even beging to get a clue of what this clusterfuck is about. I try to summarize the films so-called plot with the help of IMDb and Wikipedia.

Sam Witwicky is going to college while the Autobots are in hiding waiting to see if the Decepticons will try to make another attack on human race. They are also assisting the military (in various search and destroy missions). For some reason the Cube that killed the evil Megatron in the previous film is now used to bring him back to life and so the Decepticon team is as dangerous as ever. The new demmycrat president Obama initially looks for a peaceful solution in the conflict, but when the Decepticons do their initial attack, he is said to have ran away like a coward. The Decepticons also awaken and ancient murder-robot named The Fallen and seek to destroy the Earth's sun with his help. But they need an ancient item to start the machine that does so. And conviniently Sam has just found the item everyone wants by dumb luck, which makes him once again hunted by the baddies. But what he really wants is to get some more of that sweet, sweet pussy, first from a new girl he meets at college, and then when she is revealed to be a robot, from Megan Fox again. There is an outrageous time spent on various college hijinks, including Witwicky's asshole mother accidentally eating a hash brownie and becoming an even bigger asshole.

What is usually remembered of the film is it's blatant sexism and racism. Bay actually began his career as a director for various Playboy's Playmate interviews, and he utilizes the same technique in shooting Megan Fox (and Rosie Huntington-Whitley in the next one). Every shot is of ther composed so that either her ass or boobs are the centre of attention. Also the character in film react to her by ogling at her curves at all times. One robot even humps Fox's leg in a rush of passion. Fox may act terribly, but I suppose the only direction she must have gotten from bay must've been along the lines "run the way your boobs jiggle a little more". It's no wonder she called her director Hitler in the film's promotion tour.

If Megan Fox would've bent over just a bit more, she would've snapped like a twig.
The sexism extends to the humour, which is blatantly cruel for a film directed at children to buy toys. Thus, along the way we get to see a robot's balls, a robot ejaculating on a beautiful woman, and of course, the most traumatizing of all, John Turturro's hairy butt. FOR NO REASON AT ALL.

Even worse is the film's racism. Bay's characterization of some of the robots makes George Lucas look subtle. Some of the comic sidekicks include two jive-talking robot twins that are pimp-green and orange in car form. In robot form they look like monkeys with huge ears and big arms. They are depicted as stupid, lazy and all-around unpleasant. They can't stop talking and the other has a gold tooth in his mouth. Oh, and they tell Sam that "reading is for suckers". All that's missing is them craving for watermelon or fried chicken. With all the violence, sex, fascism, xenophobia, and messages such as these, one must wonder if Bay is consciously attempting to corrupt today's children. If I were a father I would forbid these sorts of films from my children in an instant. But a lot of people didn't really care, and thus the abomination became the highest crossing film of the year.

★

Transformers: Dark of the Moon (2011)
Director: Michael Bay



Michael Bay listened to some criticism from his previous film in creating his trilogy closer. The film was mostly shot in 3D and thus the length of the shots depicting actions had to be longer and the action shot from further away to have any sort of effect. Ye gods – now you can actually make what is going on on the screen! Also, the crude humour of the series is a lot less toned down in the film, the character of Deep Wang notwithstanding.

The film starts off with reminiscing that the Transformer war has actually raged around Earth for decades. An Autobot spaceship crashed the Earth's Moon years ago – and someone then hid some extra Decepticons on the Dark Side of the Moon, I guess. During the first moon landing Neil Armstrong took a look at the spaceship-thing. After that, the whole affair was forgotten by everyone for years, probably because of all the ungrounded goverment conspiracist covering of the subject. No matter that it might have been useful two movies ago, they hide the facts in here too even though it might save some time and save lives. So, when the truth is finally revealed, it sparks the Autobot-Decepticon war to rage with all its might. But we won't actually get into that for 1,5 hours, as we have to endure scenes where Sam Witwicky is looking for a job. He needs work to support his new girlfriend, who's such a useless character I won't even bother looking her name up (Rosie Huntington-Whitley). At least this time our hero's cut of booty is secured, but he still remains as whiny, insecure and easy to hate as ever.

"I'll switch to this sex doll head. I won't have to rescue her ass as often."
While it is an actual film, as opposed to Revenge of the Fallen, one really can't say Dark of the Moon is good in any way. It's purgatory-long, badly paced, has a lot of scenes that don't go nowhere, and it is as moronically badly written as ever. Alongside the action sequences (the longest of which lasts a full hour), what is spiced up is the unbelievably right-wing message. We meet our heroic Autobots somewhere in the Middle East, posing as cars. When they are stopped by a toll booth, they take it upon themselves that the Arab customs officials are terrorists and shoot the hell out of them. During the course of the film, wise old Optimus Prime spurs such heartwarming wisdom as: "Now, we take the battle to them!", "I'm coming to get you!", and "We'll kill them all!". The next paragraph contains a SPOILER concerning the end scenes.

Near the end, the Decepticons are executing the Autobots they have captured by throwing them to the ground and shooting them in the back of their heads. What sinister villains! But in the end, Megatron himself would offer peace to Optimus Prime after their common enemy is defeated. Optimus then rips his head off, with a piece of his spine. Megetron's already defeated boss then gets a shot to the neck just like the POWs before. Um... USA!? USA!?

So the lines of good and bad in this film are pretty much a grey area, then. How are we to know, who to root for and who to hiss for, then? We are being overly emphasized that the Autobots have adapted to the American culture, whereas the Decepticons hang in Africa, speak in robo-speak or in dialect, and most heinously, don't look like people as much as Autobots. But don't fear, the Autobots have promised to protect humans and Earth from all threats. Except that in one point in the film they allow the Decepticons to completely destroy Chicago and kill all its inhabitants to tach humans a lesson that the Decepticons are not to be trusted. Oops.

★

Saturday, 7 May 2011

6. Haapsalu Õudus- ja Fantaasiafilmide Festival



To widen my yearly film festival experiences, I should look out for foreign festivals. Now, I can say that this first time I visited a festival in Estonia, was by no means the last time. Estonia, and its capital Tallin, is merely a 1,5 hour ferry trip away from Helsinki. The town of Haapsalu in turn is about a 2 hour bus drive away from the harbor city of Tallinn. So it's easy as pie to visit. I had a swell packet trip to the 6th Haapsalu's Festival for Horror- ja Fantasiafilms (hereon referred as HÕFF) with a group of fellow film aficionados. The quiet country town of Haapsalu, which is built around a medieval castle, is also a suitable scene for a horror film festival. The only downside was that the culture centre which held the screenings wasn't entirely finished and thus for example the sound quality of the films was poor. Unlike in Night Visions, the films at HÕFF didn't run through all night, but left some time to party out in the city's sole night club.

Off to Leipzig (Leipzigisse)
Director: Hardi Keerutaja (Estonia 2011)

I always try to see at least one of the native country's films in each foreign festival I attend to. This time it only included this short film. It's a historical story about a student looking to be a doctor. He goes to a remote farm to treat a patient who acts violent and has a supernatural aura around her. He turns to protect her from her family to take her to the University city of Leipzig.

The film looks and feels like a student film and the twists are pretty obvious for anyone who knows their horror films. Yet the director Hardi Kaarutaja manages to create an athmosphere of threat throughout the film. He utilizes the Estonian forest as a transitional scene to a supernatural world pretty well. Also the scenes of violence are pretty inventive and fun. It was nice enough to see this film from an inflatable screen on the castle courtyard, yet the creeping coldness and hunger sadly prevented me from seeing Brian Yuzna's latest horror-comedy Amphibious, which seemed silly enough and an apt parody judging from the first couple of minutes. Here's hoping someone brings it to a finnish horror film festival.

Red, White & Blue
Director: Simon Rumley (USA/UK 2010)


The theme series of Midnight America was kicked off by my account very well with this pitch-black tragedy. The film follows three people whose paths are about to get tangled to each other. First, we have the young Erica (Amanda Fuller) who feels her life is hollow and meaningless. She spends most her nights picking up strangers in bars and having wild sex with them. Yet nothing seems enough for her. One of her multiple partners is Franki (Marc Senter) who learns that he has gotten the HI-virus from her. As Franki's life has been crumbling around him anyway, he seeks revenge. But meanwhile Erica has met Nate (Noah Taylor), an ominous-seeming character who is probably the only person who's not interested in Erica purely for the sexual pleasure. But Nate surely doesn't have everything home, either and he starts to develop a very a strong feeling of possession over Erica.

Red White & Blue is a character piece more than it is a horror film, and it takes its time to delve into its the main character's minds, emotions and the baggage they carry. At the outside most of them just seem emotionless and cold but beyond the surface might lurk a disturbing truth. As one can deduct from the title, the film also carries a subtext about the whole American culture, which is after all based on violence. The film does look cheap and the camerawork leaves something to improve. But nevertheless if Rumley gets a little better resouces for his next film, I believe it is well worth waiting for.

★★★ 1/2
Beyond the Black Rainbow
Director: Panos Cosmatos (Canada 2011)


Those that think that Moon was a ponderous and arty sci-fi movie should try this on for size. BtBR moves at a glacier pace with barely a plot at all. It relies more on the images and the athmosphere. The film involves a young girl (Eva Allan) who seems to have some PSI-abilities. She is being held in a mental hospital where a sadistic doctor (Michael Rogers) keeps taunting and experimenting on her. Eventually, she sets off to escape, the doctor in her tail. Reportedly the director Cosmatos based this film on old VHS covers of Canadian horror and exploitation films such as the works of David Cronenberg.

I honestly have difficulties reviewing this film properly as I was tired as this was shown and it requires almost hypnotic concentration. Comparing this to Tarkovsky isn't too far off, at least in the field of flow, athmosphere and storytelling styles. But the result is even more surprising, and is not afraid to drop the style used to make a scene with something completely different. The images are striking and memorable. I would say I'd need to see this again. I think it is an exceptional piece by all means and thus ample material for finnish festivals too.

★★★

House of the Devil
Director: Ti West (USA 2009)


I had heard good rumblings about Ti West's tribute to the moodier horror films of yesteryear, yet had wondered why the film hadn't been brought to Night Visions or other festivals. Well, HÕFF's guest of honor, Twitch Film's Todd Brown hailed this to be one of the best films of the last five years, so I was willing to give it a benefit of a doubt. And indeed, in some ways this was the best film of the festival. At least in the "horror" category.

House of the Devil is about the college student Samantha (Jocelin Donahue), about to move to her first own apartement. Yet she lacks the monetary funds and thus opts to become a babysitter to an odd family living in the middle of nowhere. She and her feisty friend Greta Gerwig (Megan) are no fools and the girls take off to the house together to avoid any psychopath shenanigans. Yet as it turns out, there is foul play going on and the girls are soon separated and scared. The film is based on the wide-spred scare of the 80's that Satanic cults thirsting on innocent blood may hide in any neighbourhood without a trace to the outside.

West's film works great as a tribute. Unlike many other nostalgic horror directors, he hasn't chosen the campiest and silliest aspects of the 70's and 80's to replicate. The setting, the music and clothing do bring back those times, but not in an in-you-face or over-the-top style. Instead, the film is a welcome return of the kind of horror films that play on having a disturbing mood to them and are constantly one-upping the feeling of paranoia shared by the main characters as well as the audience. The film is created with seemingly small resources, as you don't really need more than a small scratch or a moving shadow to scare the audience if played right. So good is the first part of the film that the ending is a clear let-down of panicky running around. It's not that bad per se, as the most obvious clichés are avoided, yet still feels too conventional for a movie that started this good. I'll have to reflect this on the film's score, but for a really chilling old-school horror film, it's certainly one of the best of the last decade.

★★★ 1/2

Stake Land
Director: Jim Mickle (USA 2010)


Stake Land is a modern survivalist story set in a postapocalyptic world. That means gloom and doom in the same vein as The Road or I Am Legend. This time (again) the world is plagued by vampires, who are zombie-like lunatic running corpses in this one.  Trying to survive on their way from town to town are the tough-as-nails Mister (Nick Damici, the film's co-writer) and the young, inexperienced Martin (Connor Paolo). The world they live in is divided to armed fortresses, where life goes on pretty normally, and to the dangerous wasteland. Yet nowhere is the pair safe so they must keep on travelling. On their way a group of other misfits join their group and start to form a new, blended family.

Essentially this plays like Zombieland without the jokes. It's not entirely a good thing, as the film is pretty dark yet at the same time a bit ridiculous. A couple of times some pitch-black humour shines through, yet I still don't appreciate the film's seriousness. For the film also attempts to bring a subtext of the state of the American Bible-belt. As is often the case, dangerous uninfected people are much more of a threat than the lurking monsters. In this film they include the fundementalists trying to run their own show in a world gone to hell. If this is meant to satirize, then the edge of the parody is far too blunt, because the religious types here actually seem a lot more reasonable and rational than the actual tele-evangelists that plague intelligent Americans to this day. The film's villains are also annoyingly gloating and indestructible.

The best (and the most ridiculous) scene of the movie shows fundementalists drop vampires from a helicopter to a carnival. If only the same kind of bright gallows-humour  ideas were used in the film more often. Or even if the scene was a little more clearly edited.

★★

Hobo with a Shotgun
Director: Jason Eisener (Canada 2011)



Ah, my most awaited film of the festival and it didn't let me down.  Hobo is based on a fake trailer by Jason Eisener that won a competition to be included in prints of Grindhouse in the US. Eisener's fake trailer had such an outstanding and off-the-wall idea that it actually surpassed in quality the professional trailers of Eli Roth, Edgar Wright et al. It was a godsent gift that Eisener was able to create his vision into a full-length movie and starring Rutger Hauer himself, no less.

Hauer is just as perfect for the lead of this sleaze-fest as they come. He plays a poor hobo that comes to Scum City (formerly Hope City) on a freight train. He starts to look for a job but soon finds out the town is being terrorized by a family of gangsters who don't hold any particular appreciation for the integrity of human life. In particular he starts to protect the hooker Abby (Molly Dunsworth) but this leads him at odds with the bad guys and the corrupt police force of the City. Ultimately he has no option but to not buy his desired lawnmover and rather opt for an equally cheap shotgun. The hobo stops begging and demands for change!

Hobo is a trash film through and through. There are excessive amounts of gore, the film is shot in cartoony coloured lights and it has a wild punk rock feel where anything can happen. Thus children get torched by a flamethrower, people get kicked in the back with ice skates and someone gets their gentitals blown away. It's certainly not for everyone, and that includes anyone who doesn't find poor taste and showers of gore hilarious. Of course that certainly doesn't include me. The closest comparison for the film might be the best Troma films from back at the VHS era. They had the same air of mixing totally bonkers ideas with parodying clichéd conventions. This does so too and goes along the same rails as your regular vigilantist story or even western where a stranger shows up to bring order to a chaotic small town. But how many westerns have you seen where the main character suddenly fights indestructible biker robots that have an octopus in their cellar prison? Thought so. Highly recommended for gore-hounds. Oh, and I love the synth-score of the film!

★★★★

Karate-Robo Zabogar (Denjin Zaborgar: Gekjio-ban)
Director: Noboru Iguchi (Japan 2011)


The Japanese production company Sushi Typhoon is known for genre films that usually are heavy in gore but light in sense. Now they've extended their filmmaking to superhero films as well, with an adaptation of a popular TV-series from the '70s. It concerns the heroic duo of Yutaka Daimon (Yasuhisa Furuhara / Itsuji Itao) and his trusty transforming motorcycle/robot companion Zaborgar taking on the evil organization Sigma. The leader of Sigma, Dr. Akunomiya (Akira Emoto) had killed his father years ago while collecting DNA from the world's leading scientists and politicians to create an ultimate super-cyborg. Things get complicated when Daimon falls for Akunomiya's hench-woman Miss Borg (Mami Yamasaki), much to the distaste of Zaborgar.

Sushi Typhoon's films tend to often be hit-and-miss and Zaborgar only enhanches this view. The opening of the film has plenty of goofy villains, trampoline jumps, monsters with diarrhea and best of all, American football-playing schoolgirl cyborgs who have dinosaurs come out of their boobs. (This prompts one person to hilariously shout out "DINOSAUR ARMY!?") But the problem with all this is the flimsy plot which can't be covered by any number of surreal jokes. In the middle the film does a big twist, which is a joke in the expense of the viewer that has watched the original series. Sadly, western audiences who don't know the series are left cold by this change and the rest of the film doesn't stand up to the standards of the beginning. The end credits also reveal that many of the films greatest bits were actually reproduced shot-by-shot from the original series. So if it weren't for the dinosaur-tits, this would've been a complete waste of time.

★★

Norwegian Ninja (Kommandør Treholt & ninjatroppen)
Director: Thomas Cappelen Malling (Norway 2010)


Norway has recently built a reputation for its film industry, that has made an impressive amount of fun genre-films. I hope Rare Exports isn't a fluke and us Finns can manage the same in the upcoming years. Norwegian Ninja completes the festival's set of films that are a tribute to the genre cinema of yesteryears. But instead of treading on the same paths as already ridiculous Mats Helge's scandinavian ninja flicks, director Malling builds a sort of GI Joe universe for his ninjas.

It's 1984 and the Norwegian government has a top secret island where they train ninjas to carry on missions concerning the state security. The ninjas live peacefully, feeding cute animals among their training and looking for enlightenment. But at the same time another secret organization has more sinister plans. A rival intelligence agency plans to do terrorist attacks in Norway and blame the Soviet Union from them, in order to get Norway's foreign politics closer to the USA. Only Commender Arne Treholt and his group of ninjas can stop this diabloical plan. But which ninjas can he trust and which not?

The film has a big amount of fun ideas and the feeling of 80's after-school action shows and Thunderbirds is accurately recreated. Particularly the underwater espionage scenes are cool. Sadly, the film's editing looks for an ultra-slick style (seen, for example, in Edgar Wright's films), but ends up being sloppy. It doesn't help that the plot is utterly confusing. The film doesn't concentrate enough on its main characters and thus some of their actions seem odd and unexplained. But since this is the filmic equivelent of a director playing with his action figures, I suppose one can forgive this.

★★★

Friday, 1 April 2011

The Directors: Michael Bay

Note: This post was an April Fool's prank in 2011. So no new readers would think I was completely insane, here are the corrected ratings for Michael Bay-films.


As action directors go, probably the most talented there ever has been is Michael Bay. He's a true auteur in Hollywood, allowed to make films that feel like his own handwork is in the every last image of the film.  And his films rank among the best in each of their respective genre. Unlike a lot of people seem to think, Bay's films are not just simply "explosion" porn. they contain a lot of really deep human characters and their heart-breaking relationships among really harsh times. It would be time to take a look at his brilliant filmography and to start eagerly await his latest, Transformers: The Dark of the Moon. I bet this summer delivers another satisfying trilogy closer to a great toy movie franchise, where characters can go out in style.

Bad Boys (1995)



Putting the "Bad" back to the "Boys in Blue", Bay stuck gold with his very first full-length film. Taking the buddy cop formula that had been getting tired with each successive Lethal Weapon sequel, Martin Lawrence and Will Smith shift a new gear in. The story involves a hilarious mixup, as Martin Lawrence's married cop has to pretend to be Will Smith, a swinging bachelor. He can't get any from his wife and to avoid her wanting a divorce, not from the hot witness he protects from the EuroTrash gangsters, either. Hilarious! Of course protecting a hottie such as Teá Leoni is a full-time job and he needs Smith's help to spur one-liners and to shoot a lot of bullets. There's a suitable amount of car crashs and explosions, yet one can clearly see Bay is just learning to perfect his tools. This film's success allowed him to come up with a real banger!

★★★★

The Rock (1996)



Ready to Rock? The Rock is probably the best movie ever made to be watched before going to a bar or a party. It gets those sweet, sweet adrenaline juices flowing. And now YOU'RE the Rocket Man (someone please help me). The film is about Colonel Ed Harris kidnapping the Alcatraz prison and all the tourists there and apparently blowing them up with bath soap? The world needs Nicolas Cage's Beatle-fan pencil-pusher and Sean Connery's escape artist ex-spy (now a bearded convict) to break in and stop him. Cue a lot of meaningless car chases and stuff blowing up just for the hell of it. Bay was still a modest Bruckheimer-boy, doing what the producer told him to. But he still delivered one of the most shamelessly quotable and explodable action films of the '90s. His later films were more like his own babies. I'll still have to take one point off for not allowing Nicolas Cage to swear. What in the name of Zeus's butthole indeed.

★★★★

Armageddon (1998)

 
If a giant meteor truly were to hit the Earth and destory us all, I wouldn't trust no pencil-neck scientists or experts to get us out of that trouble. Bay agrees, and puts out a team of good ol' boys that aren't afraid to get their hands dirty to explode the space threat. Bay's first real masterpiece has all the bangs of a Roland Emmerich movie (and the famous landmarks destroyed. Top exploding the entire Paris, Roland!), but has a great ensemble cast of character actors having meaty roles. We have Bruce Willis, Ben Affleck, Liv Tyler, Owen Wilson, Billy Bob Thornton, Jason Isaacs and Michael Clarke Duncan, for starters. I just wish Steve Buscemi wouldn't almost ruin the whole thing with his overacting, but the sad finale saves a lot (like the entire Earth, for instance!). The payoff to the film's sweet and touching romance made me cry. How about you?

★★★★★

Pearl Harbor (2001)



Love is stronger than any war, is the message of Bay's next tear-jerker. And it really one-ups Titanic in the historical melodrama genre. Three hours simply aren't enough to absorb all the tragedy and the futility of a war that had to come between the love triangle of Ben Affleck, Josh Hartnett and Kate Beckinsale. Wise old Bay shows us how surprising things such as WWII starting with an attack on US Army base can drive us apart. The action scenes are pretty good too, but the real meat of the film is in the strong romance. Bay does know how to create a strong, independent and intelligent female character we in the audience can all fall for. It's not just boy's enetertainment any more from this point on. The film was unfairly mocked in Team America, but then again, Parker and Stone were wrong about The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull as well.

★★★★★

Bad Boys II (2003)

'Nuff said.
★★★★★

The Island (2005)


Fun and larger-than-life films and touching romances are one thing Michael Bay proved he's also a thought-provoking artist with this deep sci-fi thriller, that goes to questions about our own existence. Ewan McGregor lives in an odd society where everything is seemingly OK and everyone is promised a trip to a paradise island. But he finds out that an evil corporation is cloning pretty people and harvesting their organs. He himself is one of the clones. Now he and another, female, clone Scarlett Johansson must go on the run. The Island is light on the explosions, but heavy in the mind as we come to ponder what really makes a human? Bay agrees that it's the emotions, evident with the fact that the two clones start to fall for each other. But evil society won't allow it, in a classic romance way. Today it's a cow, tomorrow it's you.

★★★★

Transformers (2007)



OO! Shiny new toys! Bay takes the Hasbro format of giant robot and has a playtime that's so amusing to watch, two and a half hours just seem to fly by. One of his greatest ideas was to strip the robots from their boring characteristics and focus the film on all too real life scenarios. I mean, which teenager hasn't tried to get laid by getting his dad to buy him a car? Poor ones, I can tell you that. But with Megan Fox, one has a plausible MacGuffin to strive for. Nevermind the weird cube thingy, exept that's pretty cool, too. Evil robots want to get their hands on that cube to rule the universe so Shia LaBeouf must organize a group of good robots capable of turning into cars (the bad ones turn into scorpions and such) to fight the evil and to keep the cube safe. It's a miracle of a summer-film, with so many deep backstories and mythologies, and at the same time hilarious humour such as a robot pissing on John Turturro. The only reason this only gets four stars is because the second one managed to top even this!

★★★★

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (2009)



Loving the latest Transformers film might get a big backlash in the internet. Sure, the film's story is a little hard to follow, there are a lot of characters to keep track of and the mythology of the films gets a lot deeper from the previous film. But that's what repeat viewings are for, right? Once again, Bay wisely leaves out all sorts of drama with the robots and instead focuses on more realistic action scenes. The continuous scenes with soldiers in a Navy carrier sending jets to do the fighting giddy up the viewer's excitement for some serious explosion scenes. Bay also perfectly replicates the chaotic feeling of a real war battle. Where is the enemy and what should I do is constantly in the viewer's mind at all times during the battle scenes. But it's not just an action film. Bay also peppers his masterpiece with hilarious college humor scenes. I hurt my stomach laughing so much of Sam's mom eating hash brownies, or the running jokes about things humping people's legs (first a dog and later a robot! Brilliant foreshadowing). And John Turturro's ass for no reason! It's the best action blockbuster of recent years. Just ask Armond White.

★★★★★

So, Michael Bay scores the astonishing 4,5. Wow, I might have gotten a bit carried away, but one can't deny that every last film the director has made hadn't been excellent in their own genre.

Thursday, 18 November 2010

Movies I-wanna-see Rises

First things first. You may notice a small difference in the title of this blog. Yeah, I figured that since I usually spend weeks to perfectly tune each blog post to be absolutely perfect, it's not so Fast any more, is it. So with just changing one letter I made a reference to a british sketch comedy a reference of a rarely-seen arthouse film. And what does "Last" mean? Is this the last, final word on movies and you don't need to turn to any other blogs for advice afterwards? Or is it just that each post takes so long that this will be the last one to report? You be the judge. As I'm fairly sure that my Best-of-the-2000s series will continue to 2012, while other blogs finished their lists about a year ago, I'll try to do it as a little bit of both. I'll also keep developing the blog. The URL will stay the same for now, but if some morning you won't find it in the old address, try to change the letter as well. And now, to business.

You know what we haven't had in a while? Pointless lists of awesomely shitty movies I haven't seen yet. Having a little more ambition with this blog certainly didn't mean you would get rid of those. So, like a zombie or the Dark Knight, here's another installment in our exciting series.

ALLUDA MAZAAKA! (1995)



Some of my friends have seen this batshit insane Indian actioner and say it's the greatest thing since the domestication of the horse. Unfortunately the link of the awesome tractor fight from the film has been removed from YouTube, but at least this scene is some compensation for it.

AMERICAN COMMANDOS (1982)



It's the Philippenean Death Wish meets Delta Force - and so much more including a ninja picture.

BILLY THE KID VS. DRACULA (1966)
http://www.youtube.com/v/AjgJ3gMF2sk?fs=1&hl=fi_FI

This is a match I'd like to see! Although I do hope Billy has some Blade-like garlic weapons or something or this'll be a one-sided match.

CEMETARY MAN (Dellamote, dellamorte, 1994)



I'm not entirely sure if all of this comedy is intentional or not. This could be the italian Evil Dead II.
"Why?! You were always so understanding!"

THE CRIPPLED MASTERS (1979)


If people missing limbs can play music, they can do kung-fu too!

DARK ANGEL (a.k.a. I come in Peace, 1990)



Dolph Lundgren vs. a Mortal Kombat-powered alien! YES!

E'GAD, ZOMBIES! (2010)


Ian McKellen in a period zombie film?! Yes, please!

THE DRAGON LIVES AGAIN (1977)


If you don't want to see Bruce Lee meet (and fight) Popeye and James Bond, you're dead to me.

HALF A LOAF OF KUNG FU (1980)


But Jackie Chan doesn't meet Popeye...
...Jackie Chan BECOMES Popeye. Mind = blown.

JACK FROST (1964)



This is crazy film based on a a Russian folk tale, not the Michael Keaton snowman movie, although that sounds awful too.

L'EXECUTEUR


This is the sort of thing most french movies would need. Take notes, Godard.

MATANGO - ATTACK OF THE MUSHROOM PEOPLE (1963)


I wonder what shrooms the makers were on?

MYSTICS IN BALI (1981)



I see Re-Animator got some ideas here - but toned them down. This is one of the most fucked-up-looking films I've ever seen!

NORWEGIAN NINJA (2010)


I have a thing for Scandinavian ninja movies.

THE ONE-ARMED EXECUTIONER (1983)


The first Bobby Suarez film I-wanna-see, inspired by the documentary Machete Maidens Unleashed.

OUTLAND (1981)


According to Empire magazine it has Sean Connery making Space his bitch. Ace.

RAZORBACK (1984)



It's got only two states of being - dangerous or dead. It being a murderous giant wild hog.

RIGHTING WRONGS (1986)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN_xxs_8Kqg

“Over studying makes you a moron.” - tag line from Righting Wrongs.

R.O.T.O.R. (1988)


Or Robotic Officer Tactical Operation Research. With a name like that, you'll just know it has some robots going on a rampage!

THE SUPER INFRAMAN (1975)



This chinese Ultraman-clone seems to be even more insane.

TIGER ON THE BEAT (1988)


I heard from trustworthy sources that this is mad as hell. Chainsaw fights and the lot. And seems to be cheerfully misogynistic to boot. Nice.

THE TOUGHEST MAN IN THE WORLD (1984)


I miss Mr T. The T used to mean Tough.

WHEELS ON MEALS (1984)


Nothing silly about this one, just seems kickass enough for my tastes.

WHO KILLED CAPTAIN ALEX? (2010)



Seriously THIS is how to do low budget films. Uganda rules!

ZOMBIE LAKE (1981)


Dead Snow didn't invent nazi zombies, although they weren't as lovelorn in that one.

Wednesday, 4 August 2010

New classics



I figured it wouldn't do too well to just list every movie I ever saw in this here blog. For a while the idea was to do deeper articles over some theme, but as I'm busy doing those 21st century lists (it would be nice if someone read them), I'm a little too busy at the moment.

So I'll try something a little different. I'll do flat-out reviews of some films I get to see on press screenings, and if I see a great older movie, I'll write something about it too. No use saving these for a later article (well, most of 'em). As I'm working for the Helsinki International Film Festival at the moment, the new reviews are a bit of a taboo, as I could use them to market my festival. So I'll mostly do just these.

So recently, I've seen the following great films:

12 Angry Men
Director: Sidney Lumet
USA, 1957

An American classic I've waited long to see. The film takes place in a single room, as 12 anonymous characters argue over one subject. This doesn't sound that promising at first, but things are kept very interesting throughout. The fact that they are a jury deciding on whether to send a man to the electric chair or not, helps of course. The film is a plea for humanism, as it condemns capital punishment as there might be a risk that innocent people get executed. It unravels this fact by letting the 11 jurors slowly come to realize that the case isn't as clear as they previously had thought. It is also a great psychological piece of the human nature and the different motivations people might have on doing a big decision. Most of them are not clean by any means. The movie is also carried by fantastic performances and I start to see what Sergio Leone saw in Henry Fonda, the original Last Boy Scout.

This used to be the highest-ranking film on the IMDb top 250 I hadn't seen. Now it's Toy Story 3.

The Big Risk (Classe Tous Risques)
Director: Claude Sautet
France, 1960

The French crime classics are cool as cucumbers, but sometimes they get a bit dull for being too similar. This rings true to most Jean-Pierre Melville's films. Yet this film, by Claude Sautet, preceeds most of them and still finds a twist or two to keep things interesting. The film follows two criminals, on the run from the law from a somewhat petty robbery. They make things harder for them by shooting police and getting the other one's family involved. Yet, they never see the error of their ways and plan to make one last heist, the big one. The problem, as usually is in these sort of tales, is the question on who to trust. The honour among thieves is flimsier among some than pothers. Even though the main characters are not too personal, the film is quite exciting as one of them has childern with him and the other falls in love. An the police won't save their bullets, as neither will rival gangsters. An edge-of-your seat stuff, here. I also like how the story takes place in various places in Europe I've recently visited, including Milan and Paris.

Forbidden Planet
Director: Fred M. Wilcox
USA, 1956
Another classic I hadn't previously seen, but this time it was my own fault. I had this on a VHS for years and years and never bothered to watch it (I still have a VHS player but as you can imagine, I watch tapes kind of rarely).

It's a kind of a rare feat, a science fiction movie made in the 50's, that's actually worth its salt. This film doesn't rely on just otherworldly special effects to tell a simple story for children. No, the story is mostly exposition, and requires the viewer to understand some concepts of Freudian psychoanalysis to make sense. But exposition in a sci-fi/fantasy environment is not a bad thing per se, as it allows the viewer to fill in the rest of the imaginary world with his/her own imagination. It works quite well here.

It is also a story on how one individual's dreams gone astray can bring death and destruction. It is a common theme in fiction, as the popular Inception also has dreams overcome their master. But Forbidden Planet has absolutely stunning sets and matte paintings for its claim, not to mention an over-serious robot as a comic relief. Inception didn't have a robot. Robbie went on to become a big star and to make a long and lasting career after this film. I remember him from Gremlins. But also the visual world of this film has inspired countless later films.

The Young One
Director: Luis Bunuel
Mexico, USA 1960
Bunuel is a brilliant director and it's always a treat to see something new from him. This drama is progressive for its time in that it concerns pretty deep racial and sexual issues. Bunuel was again, as he was more often than not, way ahead of his time. The film is a story of a young girl, and alcogholic middle-aged man and a young black man on one island.

The film's almost like an early blaxploitation movie with its characterizations, with a strong black hero, who narrow-minded white people hate, persecute and chase even without a flimsy reason. The problem is that this guy is no Dolemite and the punches and shots actually hurt him. He is seen as a sexual threat to the young girl, although the paedophilic older white man actually proves to be much more hungry for her flesh. Even the bad guy isn't one-sided, there are three-dimensional dilemmas he faces as well as a tragic history, which has made him somewhat of a people-hating hermit. Like 12 Angry Men, this one also condemns making judgements based on emotions, rather than reason and facts.

In the end the tensions are resolved, but not too cathartic. Everyone gets what one desreves even if traditional judgemet is not dealt out. Yet the film leaves an uneasy feeling. As the world hasn't changed anywhere, the characters might still have some rough times ahead. Nevertheless, a great film.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...