Monday, 9 August 2010

Review: Scott Pilgrim vs. the World



I figured it would be a good choice to do my first proper review in this blog on a film which combines a lot of stuff I like - kickass over-the-top action, dry observational character-based comedy and a sweet and life-like romance.

Scott Pilgrim vs. the World is a quite good movie, despite it being hard trying to juggle so much stuff. But if anyone could handle it it was Edgar Wright. Wright has proven himself to be able to direct with a fast, music video -like style, of pretty normal and mundane things. He is also able to make symphatetic comedy characters that are properly fleshed out.

Scott Pilgrim is based on a comic-book by Bryan Lee O'Malley. It deals with young hearts clashing while the colorful imagery references video games and manga comics. I see that the OTT style of the comic represents on how the characters feel their (love) life is larger than life. It's how it is with under-25 young people. In this universe characters can do basically anything: crash the moon with the earth, turn people into quarters or make sonic blasts with guitars. Usually this sort of magic requires either love or music, the two biggest mysteries and the hardest to properly explain of all the things humans have created.

The titular character is a slacker in his early twenties. He's just met a new girlfriend, the 17-year-old Knives (Ellen Wong). He introduces her to punk music with his band, Sex Bob-Omb. But as their relationship progresses Scott grows anxious as he's dreaming about a mysterious woman on rollerskates, Ramona (Mary Elizabeth Winstead). When he finally meets her, he decides that she is the woman of his dreams and gives everything to be with her. But besides having to break up with his prior girlfriend, this means he has to battle seven bitter old flames of Ramona.

It doesn't take a genius to figure out Wright is a perfect director for this source material. It's hard trying to come up with a word for his visual style that doesn't refer to comic books. After all, comics can have vastly different visual styles. But the movie Scott Pilgrim uses a lot of styles usually attributed to the comics media, so there's that. Sound effects are displayed by text, split-screens resemble comic panels, the color scheme is bright and colorful etc. It's worth noting that not everything is copied from the comic book's visuals (like in say, Sin City). Rather, Wright creates his own visual that utilizes much but not everything from O'Malley's original black-and-white drawings. It owes also much to various video games (such as Street Fighter, Devil May Cry and Mortal Kombat) and to anime movies. All in all, this style works better for film than the straight copying of the comic book's style and dynamic would. But there are still a couple of cues straight from O'Malley's book that work just as good on the big screen. I loved the awkward meet of Scott's two girlfriends and the gratitious zooming in the film as much as in the comic.

As I've stated, the editing is fast and furious, even more so than in Wright's previous movies. It is fitting that the soundtrack consists of fast and furious punk rock music as well. I really, really love the film's Sex Bob-Omb songs, composed by the alternative-wonderboy Beck. Another great one is the song played by The Clash At Demonhead, the in-movie band of Scott's and Ramona's evil exes. I can't wait to get the soundtrack. Luckily, there are currently places on the internet where one can listen to it for free! And I'm doing just that. This music rocks, and hard!

O'Malley's story's strength is his large cast of characters, all of whch are well-written and believable in that universe and many of them multi-dimensional. The characters have been formed by their histories, which Wright only has time to subtly reference. Sometimes he uses O'Malley's illustrations to do this.
Wright has chosen his supporting cast well, as even with few lines, they bring out the same characters I fell in love with in the comic book. There are a lot of favorites from the wise-and-goofy-at-the-same-time gay roommate Wallace, the angry redheaded Kim or Scott's ditzy little sister. Or, of course any of the evil exes, with which especially part-time superheroes Brandon Routh and Chris Evans seem to have a blast with. Michael Cera and Mary Elizabeth Winstead are both good, but overshadowed by the frankly brilliant supporting cast. However, their relationship works in the film too, and one can reflect one's own heartbreaks and loves on the screen. This is a feat only films that have characters one can truly identify with, can have.

We in Finland are not that familiar with O'Malley's comic book. Most of my co-workers had not heard of it. I myself ordered the three first books from the web to prepare for this movie. The movie seems to work well for people who don't know the story beforehand too. I myself am still glad I read some of the book, as it fleshes out some relationships and drama as I had a better idea of the character's motivations. The film is aimed for an audience from teens to mid-twenties (more if they are really childish). Many people older from that probably won't understand anything from the kinetic style, or have forgotten what it feels like to have heartache at this age. For us that do, and geek out over the stuff this references, this is warmly recommended. It has a quite tight competition from Sylvester Stallone's The Expendables and Eat, Pray, Love, but like Scott himself, his film might prove out to be quite the fighter.

★★★★

SCOTT PILGRIM VS. THE WORLD
USA, UK, Canada, 2010
Director: Edgar Wright
Screenplay: Edgar Wright, Michael Bacall, based on the comic book by Bryan Lee O'Malley

Wednesday, 4 August 2010

New classics



I figured it wouldn't do too well to just list every movie I ever saw in this here blog. For a while the idea was to do deeper articles over some theme, but as I'm busy doing those 21st century lists (it would be nice if someone read them), I'm a little too busy at the moment.

So I'll try something a little different. I'll do flat-out reviews of some films I get to see on press screenings, and if I see a great older movie, I'll write something about it too. No use saving these for a later article (well, most of 'em). As I'm working for the Helsinki International Film Festival at the moment, the new reviews are a bit of a taboo, as I could use them to market my festival. So I'll mostly do just these.

So recently, I've seen the following great films:

12 Angry Men
Director: Sidney Lumet
USA, 1957

An American classic I've waited long to see. The film takes place in a single room, as 12 anonymous characters argue over one subject. This doesn't sound that promising at first, but things are kept very interesting throughout. The fact that they are a jury deciding on whether to send a man to the electric chair or not, helps of course. The film is a plea for humanism, as it condemns capital punishment as there might be a risk that innocent people get executed. It unravels this fact by letting the 11 jurors slowly come to realize that the case isn't as clear as they previously had thought. It is also a great psychological piece of the human nature and the different motivations people might have on doing a big decision. Most of them are not clean by any means. The movie is also carried by fantastic performances and I start to see what Sergio Leone saw in Henry Fonda, the original Last Boy Scout.

This used to be the highest-ranking film on the IMDb top 250 I hadn't seen. Now it's Toy Story 3.

The Big Risk (Classe Tous Risques)
Director: Claude Sautet
France, 1960

The French crime classics are cool as cucumbers, but sometimes they get a bit dull for being too similar. This rings true to most Jean-Pierre Melville's films. Yet this film, by Claude Sautet, preceeds most of them and still finds a twist or two to keep things interesting. The film follows two criminals, on the run from the law from a somewhat petty robbery. They make things harder for them by shooting police and getting the other one's family involved. Yet, they never see the error of their ways and plan to make one last heist, the big one. The problem, as usually is in these sort of tales, is the question on who to trust. The honour among thieves is flimsier among some than pothers. Even though the main characters are not too personal, the film is quite exciting as one of them has childern with him and the other falls in love. An the police won't save their bullets, as neither will rival gangsters. An edge-of-your seat stuff, here. I also like how the story takes place in various places in Europe I've recently visited, including Milan and Paris.

Forbidden Planet
Director: Fred M. Wilcox
USA, 1956
Another classic I hadn't previously seen, but this time it was my own fault. I had this on a VHS for years and years and never bothered to watch it (I still have a VHS player but as you can imagine, I watch tapes kind of rarely).

It's a kind of a rare feat, a science fiction movie made in the 50's, that's actually worth its salt. This film doesn't rely on just otherworldly special effects to tell a simple story for children. No, the story is mostly exposition, and requires the viewer to understand some concepts of Freudian psychoanalysis to make sense. But exposition in a sci-fi/fantasy environment is not a bad thing per se, as it allows the viewer to fill in the rest of the imaginary world with his/her own imagination. It works quite well here.

It is also a story on how one individual's dreams gone astray can bring death and destruction. It is a common theme in fiction, as the popular Inception also has dreams overcome their master. But Forbidden Planet has absolutely stunning sets and matte paintings for its claim, not to mention an over-serious robot as a comic relief. Inception didn't have a robot. Robbie went on to become a big star and to make a long and lasting career after this film. I remember him from Gremlins. But also the visual world of this film has inspired countless later films.

The Young One
Director: Luis Bunuel
Mexico, USA 1960
Bunuel is a brilliant director and it's always a treat to see something new from him. This drama is progressive for its time in that it concerns pretty deep racial and sexual issues. Bunuel was again, as he was more often than not, way ahead of his time. The film is a story of a young girl, and alcogholic middle-aged man and a young black man on one island.

The film's almost like an early blaxploitation movie with its characterizations, with a strong black hero, who narrow-minded white people hate, persecute and chase even without a flimsy reason. The problem is that this guy is no Dolemite and the punches and shots actually hurt him. He is seen as a sexual threat to the young girl, although the paedophilic older white man actually proves to be much more hungry for her flesh. Even the bad guy isn't one-sided, there are three-dimensional dilemmas he faces as well as a tragic history, which has made him somewhat of a people-hating hermit. Like 12 Angry Men, this one also condemns making judgements based on emotions, rather than reason and facts.

In the end the tensions are resolved, but not too cathartic. Everyone gets what one desreves even if traditional judgemet is not dealt out. Yet the film leaves an uneasy feeling. As the world hasn't changed anywhere, the characters might still have some rough times ahead. Nevertheless, a great film.

Tuesday, 3 August 2010

Maskula

Just a short item of interest. Many finns know the ruthless critic Tapani Maskula, from Turku. He has a reputation of not liking anything, and as I've been to the same press screenings with him, a couple of times I've heard him complaining about the film he's about to see before the film has started rolling. Well, I still respect the man for maintaining a sort of a class. Now someone has collected a list of films he has deemed 5-star worthy.

I'll have to say, it's a pretty good list, except for one thing.

Alien 3, WTF? It's clearly the worst of the Alien bunch and its themes (borrowed largely from the first one) are probably the most obvious in this one. The studio interference of everything interesting they were pitching at the movie is painfully obvious. And they killed Hicks! Maybe Maskula confused that piece of garbage with the more superior Aliens?

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...